site stats

Cir v people’s stores walvis bay pty ltd

Web(Lategan v CIR 1926 CPD 203; CIR v People s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 1990 (2) SA 353A). The taxpayer s argument The taxpayer argued that in order to give rise to an accrual the right to claim payment from its customers must be unconditional. WebCOMMISSIONER FOR INLAND REVENUE v PEOPLE‟S STORES (WALVIS BAY) (PTY) LTD. 52 SATC 9 (A) - 1989 Importance Classification: Very important as the Appellate …

CONTROL: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW - Cliffe Dekker …

WebFeb 12, 2024 · In CIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 1990 2 SA 353 (A) this uncertainty appears to have been cleared where the court reiterated the Lategan … emily in paris season 2 episode 6 recap https://matchstick-inc.com

Case Law summary Definition of Gross Income - StuDocu

http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/1990/1.html WebCIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd (1990 A) The taxpayer was a retailer of clothing, footwear, household textiles and related goods and it sold its goods to its … WebCIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd. 5. the court, in applying this principle , held that the right to claim payment of a debt in the future was of such a nature that a value … dr. agathe hicks

1552. Rectification of contracts

Category:INTERPRETATION NOTE 58 (Issue 3) ACT : INCOME TAX ACT …

Tags:Cir v people’s stores walvis bay pty ltd

Cir v people’s stores walvis bay pty ltd

672. The importance of drafting - SAICA

WebJul 14, 2024 · v CIR 2 SATC 16 and CIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 52 SATC 9 that an entitlement to payment constitutes something that can “accrue”, even though actual payment is only due in future. We also know that the proviso to the definition of “gross income” in s1 of the Income Tax Act provides that where a person WebGet People v. Kurr, 654 N.W.2d 651 (2002), Court of Appeals of Michigan, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys …

Cir v people’s stores walvis bay pty ltd

Did you know?

http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/167696/ WebMP Finance Group CC (in liquidation) v C:SARS, 2 and 31 May 2007, 69 SATC 141 & CIR v Delagoa Bay Cigarette Co Ltd, 32 SATC 47 b. CIR v Lategan 1926 CPD 203, 2 SATC 16 …

WebCIR v People's Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd An amount 'accrues to' a taxpayer when the taxpayer is 'entitled to payment' and not when the amount becomes 'due and payable' in … WebPeople v. Phillips - 64 Cal. 2d 574, 51 Cal. Rptr. 225, 414 P.2d 353 (1966) Rule: A wide discretion reposes in the trial court to determine the sufficiency of the qualifications of …

Web(see Lategan v Commissioner for Inland Revenue 1926 CPD 203 at 209; Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Peoples Stores (Walvis Bay) Pty Ltd 1990 (2) SA 353 (A) at 298E; … WebCIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd. 5. the court, in applying this principle , held that the right to claim payment of a debt in the future was of such a nature that a value could be attached to it in money and the amount therefore had to …

WebCIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 1990 (2) SA 353 (A); 52 SATC 9 – ... Ltd and Others, 69 SATC 205, CIR V People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 52 SATC 9, and Cactus Investments (Pty) Ltd V CIR 61 SATC 43, that the debt must be one in respect of which the debtor is under an obligation to pay immediately. ...

Web3.1 cir v peoples stores (walvis bay) (pty) ltd, 1990 (2) sa 353 (a) 24 chapter 4: specific scenarios and reported judgments 4.1 on behalf of someone else 26 ... cir v people’s … dr agathe linsmeierWebJul 14, 2024 · We know from the cases of WH Lategan v CIR 2 SATC 16 and CIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 52 SATC 9 that an entitlement to payment … dr agathe maillonWebCIR v People Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd. 1990 (2) SA 353 (A). 6. Geldenhuys v CIR. 1974 (3) SA 256 (C), 14 SATC 419. 3 unconditional. 7. An amount is included in a person’s gross income in the year in which it is received by him or her or the year in which it accrues to him or her, whichever comes dr agathe macarezWebdecision in Lategan v CIR 2 SATC 16 (C), which were confirmed by the Appellate Division (now Supreme Court of Appeal) in CIR v People’s Stores (Walvis Bay) (Pty) Ltd 52 SATC 9 (A), the proceeds should be regarded as having accrued when the taxpayer became entitled to payment (i.e. immediately following registration of transfer). emily in paris season 2 episode 8 recapWebCIR v PEOPLE'S STORES (WALVIS BAY) (PTY) LTD The taxpayer, a retailer of clothing, footwear and household goods, sold its goods for cash and on credit. Most of the credit … emily in paris season 2 episode 6 songWebCitation22 Ill.64 Cal.2d 574, 51 Cal.Rptr. 225, 414 P.2d 353 (1966) Brief Fact Summary. The defendant is a chiropractor who was convicted of second degree felony-murder in … dr agathonWeb1 Penned by Justice Perlita J. Tria Tirona, concurred in by Justices Eugenio S. Labitoria and Eloy R. Bello, Jr.. 2 Entitled "An Act Penalizing the Making or Drawing and Issuance of a … dr agathe tonnel